Rangers 4 – 2 Celtic: Lennon’s gamble exposed by consistent opposition

Celtic lost at Ibrox for the first time since Tony Mowbray’s reign, with Neil Lennon’s tactical tinkering trumped by Ally McCoist’s more predictable approach. The reaction to Charlie Mulgrew’s deserved red-card put an end to hopes of clawing back into the game, and Rangers held out comfortably.

Celtic Lineup

As discussed in the tictactic match preview, Lennon’s selection was designed to find a happy medium between the first choice attacking “lop-sided” 4-4-2 and a more conservative alternative. Increasingly it’s looked like Lennon’s ‘Plan B’ is a 4-2-3-1 which has yielded unsuccessful, if encouraging results. Instead, the compromise was what initially appeared to be a fairly flat 4-4-2.

Celtic 4-4-2

There are two or three main factors that distinguish this from the more familiar lop-sided 4-4-2. Firstly, the obligatory Ibrox dropping of Anthony Stokes (although admittedly, he is just back from injury): Georgios Samaras tends to clock up more mileage, adds a more physical presence, and is the closest striker on the Celtic books to what is classed as a targetman. The second and third points are; instead of a midfield four consisting of three central midfielders and a creative wide-player, defender Charlie Mulgrew was introduced on the left (with murmurs that Joe Ledley was carrying a knock) and Scott Brown returned from injury to start on the right. On paper a very flat, narrow midfield in danger of ostracising the strikers.

Badr El Kaddouri was a slight surprise at left-back – his one impressive appearance so far outweighing his relative unfamiliarity and a sizeable minority(?) of fans were perturbed to see Glenn Loovens start alongside Kelvin Wilson, rather than Mulgrew.

Rangers Lineup

Rangers 4-4-2

Ally McCoist had no such selection dilemma and throughout Rangers’ financial downward spiral the more “stream-lined” squad has arguably helped galvanise the team’s organisation. In this sense, Rangers adopted the same pragmatic approach that proved to be successful in last season’s League Cup final.

As expected, Juan Ortiz was dropped to allow Nikica Jelavic to start up-front alongside Kyle Lafferty. Sasa Papac came in for Kirk Broadfoot who had been deputising at left-back.

It’s a very straightforward, traditional British strategy that sees the width provided by 2 genuine wingers, with two big guys up front to pile constant high-balls towards.

Rangers take time to find foothold

It is this exact tactic that Celtic have been unable to really deal with since the days of Martin O’Neill (although Strachan’s vintage were reasonable in this regard) and McCoist knows it. And so the pattern of play tended towards Celtic dominating possession (while not really penetrating) with Rangers hitting back quickly, high and hopefully towards the strikers (via initially Steven Naismith). It was almost a concerted effort to force a mistake from Celtic’s centre-backs and goalkeeper, who is notoriously unwilling to stray from his line either for high-balls or to sweep and intercept through-balls.

Predictably this is where the opening goal originated – Beram Kayal and (perhaps more culpably) El Kaddouri failed to deal with Lafferty, who probably should’ve been put into touch by fair means or foul. His seemingly tame cross was cleared unconvincingly by Kelvin Wilson straight into the path of Steven Naismith, who finished well. Essentially an avoidable calamity of errors worsening in severity as each instance passed.

Rangers desire to use the ball in the air was a particular issue for El Kaddouri, who even little Steven Naismith was comfortably out-heading at every opportunity, to almost an embarrassing degree. And like for the goal, when the lanky Kyle Lafferty slunk out wide, the ease in which he could take down high-balls was worrying.

Celtic’s rise

Were they more clinical at the back, Celtic could probably claim to be the better side at that point. But conceding the goal sparked two players into life, who would bridge the perceived gap between Celtic’s midfield and attack.

Most significantly, Scott Brown took it upon himself to almost act in the ‘Kris Commons’ role. Drifting in from the right, working with the strikers and carving out chances. Such was his centralness, he was almost spending more time on the left than on the right, where he was nominally playing.

Meanwhile, Gary Hooper was dropping deeper into more of a ‘number 10′ role, and was starting to linkup more successfully with Samaras’ knock-downs. On the ascendancy, the two players combined, with Brown delivering a fantastic, almost non-Brown style pass that cut wide open the Rangers defence. Hooper’s finish was delicious and reminiscent of his best form last year (which we’ve yet to see this term).

The two were looking unstoppable, but unfortunately the half-time whistle came far too soon for the duo to cause more damage, although Alan McGregor’s astonishing blunder allowed El Kaddouri’s hopeful shot to make it 2-1 before the interval.

And fall

By that point, it’s likely that Ally McCoist cottoned on to a very obvious, gaping flaw in Celtic’s setup – Scott Brown’s persistent inward excursions, however successful they may have been, were leaving Mark Wilson outnumbered, and this in turn would let Sasa Papac if executed intelligently, free Gregg Wylde down the left-hand side to finally start providing quality crosses. Equally and favourably for Rangers, Brown’s ankle injury had made it’s ugly return, and he struggled to maintain the energy that allowed him to cover so much ground, getting into such good attacking positions.

Normally, when a team starts making use of a wide over-lap, it’s bad news for the defending team. But considering Celtic’s prominent inability to deal with decent crosses, the problem was intensified. Steven Davis’ stunning shot just after half-time cracked the bar and had the alarm bells ringing after again, a cross couldn’t be dealt with. Rangers incredibly “vertical” approach was starting to pay off.

More ominously and along the same theme, Celtic were beaten in the air for the equaliser in remarkably similar circumstances to Falcao’s goal for Atletico Madrid midweek and perhaps McCoist was taking notes.

Again, the goalscorer can be seen as the furthest left player inside the box (apologies for the picture quality). Lennon was surely frustrated that Falcao was able to run uninhibited from a similar starting position, and here Scott Brown had been tasked specifically with stunting Jelavic’s movement. Charlie Mulgrew in similar fashion was used to halt Dorin Goian (slightly obscured by Jelavic in the above image).

Brown failed to hinder Jelavic, but most concerning, Loovens (the centre of the three zonal-markers) rushed out apparently convincingly only to completely miss his header.  His poor challenge against Falcao was put down to the striker having a free run, but here he completely misread the flight of the ball and shoulders much of the blame.

Pen-ultimately, continuing the aerial theme, the third came when Wylde was given that spoken of room on the left to whip in a decent cross, again dealt with poorly and Lafferty eventually scored.

Red card ends hope

El Kaddouri was continuing to be bossed in the air, and Lennon eventually lost patience bringing on Anthony Stokes. Samaras took up his less favoured spot on the left-wing and Charlie Mulgrew dropped to left-back.

Mulgrew in a way was slightly fortunate to be on the park – his booking after fifteen minutes for a dangerous lunge on Naismith could’ve been punished more severely, especially knowing the erratic nature of derby referees. And he continued to push his luck, eventually ending up hacking down Steven Davis in needless fashion to be correctly dismissed. That made two left-backs removed in the space of five minutes

This is where Lennon perhaps showed his inexperience. Where another manager at this arguably would have stabilised the team, knowing that Rangers were within touching distance (i.e. only a goal ahead). All that would be required is one big chance, as long as until the 94th minute the single goal difference stood. Instead he took a wildly more attacking stance leaving only three at the back.

Celtic 3-4-2

A wide open 3-4-2 or even 3-2-4. But the way Rangers were setup would make this formation, in theory, entirely inappropriate.

One of the foibles of using three at the back is you’re more open to threats down either flank. Normally this is alleviated by using wing-backs to cover, but with the forward styles of Samaras and James Forrest (now subbed on for the ailing Brown), Celtic’s back exhausted back three were massively exposed.

Celtic were now neither able to maintain possession (their initial strength) or create chances up front, as they had now denigrated to hopeful hail-marys. Who worse to pump high-balls up to than Anthony Stokes and Gary Hooper, or as we would then find Mohamed Bangura.

He was another strange change – clearly the 3-4-2 wasn’t working yet the final change was Bangura for Samaras. The one person would could arguably hold his own in the air replaced with another striker. Stokes moved wide into his most hated position, but by now the damage was done.


As the cliché goes, hind-sight is 20:20 and so this blog has a significant advantage over the managers it evaluates. Celtic required a goal and despite being a man down continued to add attacking players. But you only need to look as far back as Tony Mowbray to be reminded of the flawed formula – and the more the goal was chased, the more exposed the defence and the more excruciating the result. This was the case today – a promising performance thoroughly undermined: mainly by the defence and their inability to deal with crosses but also in overall strategy.

Looking back to comments made before the match from Ally McCoist, that Rangers “had too many attacking players, not to take an attacking approach“. He may have been stretching the theoretical options of his squad, but the point rings true about Celtic. The best attacking player in recent weeks (Forrest) was dropped in order to create a more combative midfield, that Rangers essentially bypassed. The most productive method of creating chances of intelligent tiki-taka passing between the likes of Hooper, Stokes, Forrest and Ki was largely rejected in favour of a more cautious approach, trying to make a targetman out of Samaras whose height, while appreciated in a defensive capacity, isn’t the route that Celtic have recently taken to score goals and win games.

While hindsight is indeed 20:20, it is a damning report. The hunt for Plan B continues, but is Plan A really that bad?


About tictacticuk

Football fan and commentator of all things Celtic FC.
This entry was posted in Rangers and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Rangers 4 – 2 Celtic: Lennon’s gamble exposed by consistent opposition

  1. paranoidandroid says:

    Your right again about the failed strategy. But you mentioned what I think I are the bigger problems after the Athletico game: not enough quality and too many square pegs in round holes.

    • tictacticuk says:

      Thanks for the comment. Aye, it’s a big worry that players are getting forced into a certain system rather than the system being shaped by the players.

      In terms of quality we should have an eleven that matches theirs? Well.. we should…

  2. blooglasgow says:

    From a Gers fan a refreshing and honest report

  3. Liam says:

    Very poor team at the moment, we actually have went back this season rather than forward.

    Why does he keep changing his team?

    It’s not looking good this season, we are staring down the barrel of 4 in-a-row.


  4. bogbhoy says:

    That performance today was shambolic. The blame lies totally 100% with Neil Lennon. When i saw the team with Brown, Samaras, Wilson (RB) and Mulgrew starting in midfield i knew it was game over. You get the feeling if we beat Athletico 25-0 on Thursday with all the goals coming from midfield that Lennon (or Lemmon as he’s becoming increasingly known as) would’ve put Brown straight back in and probably Mulgrew in midfield too. He has not got a clue, i would go as far as to say it’s the worst tactical performance from a manager i’ve seen in my lifetime at Celtic. Somehow today we managed to go in at half time 2-1 up and i was hoping Lemmon would be pro-active rather than re-active. I hoped,a fools hope i know, that he’d get Samaras and Mulgrew off for maybe Commons and Stokes. First half we were lucky it just wasn’t working and you’d hope he could see it but i think all of us knew he wouldn’t as so many times now we’ve been in similar situations where we needed to be made before it was too late. As usual today despite the huns almost scoring 4 inside the first 15 mins of the second half Lemmon still waited until it was much too late to make the subs. When he did make the sub i wanted to put my tv out the window, to switch Mulgrew to left back when he was booked and shoudlve been sent off already was just the stuff of nightmares. Any Celtic fan or watcher of football out there who wasn’t in disbelief at this? Such decisions from Lemmon are all too familiar now, to me he’s a negative and cowardly manager, i haven’t disliked a Celtic manager more. He’s full of excuses and failed promises, when it comes to big games hde reverts to the negative and baffling team selections that everyone but him and his other two stooges can see won’t work. Other familiar mistakes today, Brown (a terrible excuse for a footballer) limping around for 10 minutes before he was subbed, Lemmon sitting looking dejected on bench again when things were going wrong. Where was the leadership from him? His body language was terrible throughout and once again we witnessed the 3 stooges act when changes had to be made with the red card, the red everyone but them saw coming. Today was a disaster from start to finish and it’s happened far too often now. Lemmon and his other two stooges must go, it’s not good enough to beat the likes of St Mirren then try to forget our failures against slightly better sides until they come round again and its repeated. Im thankful for Europe this season as it will show Lemmon up for what he is and we can no longer hide behind beating poor scottish sides every week. All in all nothing will change for me until the board go as when their patsy Lemmon goes he’ll just be replaced by an equally inept manager, well maybe not equally unless we bring in Louis Walsh or someone as anyone would struggle to be worse than what we have now.

    • Little Drummer Bhoy says:

      You are not a Celtic supporter pal.

      To ridicule the Celtic manager repeatedly in that cretinous and poorly written tirade of pish was absolutely shameful.

      To mention Neil Lennon and the word “coward” in the same sentence? Astonishing, innacurate and insensitive.

      You are complete and utter fucking wanker.

      Apologies to TicTacTic, but some folk need to be told.

      • bogbhoy says:

        lol idiot. If im not a Celtic supporter then i know a whole lot of Celtic supporters who must no longer be Celtic supporters as they feel the same. Lemmon needs to go, he’s pish. I support Celtic not Neil Lennon, he’s worse than Mowbry and i want him gone.

  5. A.Bell says:

    An excellent analysis….

  6. TJ Hooper says:

    I’ve felt for a long time that Lennon shows Rangers too much respect. They have too many tall and strong players all over the pitch (a lesson well learned from MON’s team and ability to grind out results perhaps) for us to really want to try and match them in a physical tussle. Sure we need to be able to stand up and not be bullied at the back, but Celtic are at their best when we get the ball moving around. Rangers didn’t want this to descend into a game of football and successfully bullied, harassed and our back-line. It wouldn’t have happened if our ball retention and passing and movement in possession was as good as it can and should have been. It’s never going to be that good though when the likes of Sammy and Broony are on the pitch though as they disrupt our passing game. I don’t know why we don’t just put a team out there that can outplay Rangers. The major problem wasn’t so much the two big guys up front being too hard to handle, it was that it was the rest of their team had too much time and possession to try and find them with raking diagonals. I’d much rather see the likes of Ledley, Stokes, Mulgrew (as centre-half) and McCourt get some game time and let them try to get the ball from us until they tire. We should play to our own strengths first and call what Lenny did Plan B.

  7. Little Drummer Bhoy says:

    The point you make about Rangers’ limited options creating a consistency that Celtic have not enjoyed under Neil Lennon is a worryingly significant one.

    I still don’t think Neil knows what his strongest 11 is.

    TicTacTic, in your opinion, does Lennon overthink his tactic for certain big games? Do you think it’s unnecessary to significantly alter our team and tactic against Rangers?

    Also, what are your thoughts on the general lack of fitness and propensity for getting niggly injuries that the team is increasingly displaying?

    Even when we get beat, even aff the Rangers, I still enjoy reading your analysis. I don’t know if I could pay a higher compliment!

  8. Graeme Bee says:

    For me you picked up on one of the most critical tactical blunders but failed to highlight it as a blunder: “…and Lennon eventually lost patience bringing on Anthony Stokes. Samaras took up his less favoured spot on the left-wing and Charlie Mulgrew dropped to left-back.”

    I believe the manager should’ve anticipated the difficulties Mulgrew would face when up against a speeding winger and this was a red card waiting to happen.

    Your overall analysis was very much on the mark.

  9. stunney says:

    Your thoughts on the game essentially mirror mine.

    I don’t think we’ll stop repeating these mini-catastrophes until we get a solid, good quality central defensive pairing that gets fielded game after game. Loovens+K. Wilson have played together in how many games before this one? Add El Kaddouri to the mix and you have a very mutually unfamiliar set of defenders.

    Diagonal aerial passes were always going to pull this defence apart, I’m afraid. But our midfield did a poor job, especially second-half, of pressing the suppliers so as to reduce the accuracy of these high balls, and of picking up or even contesting the scraps.

  10. clarky59 says:

    I was surprised to go in at half time in the lead due to McGregor’s howler,that should have been Lennon’s signal to come out and match Rangers as much as possible in all areas of the field. Every Celtic supporter knew how Mc Coist would start the 2nd half and we did’nt match it, leaving us, with the exception of Looven’s hitting the post, chasing them all over the pitch especially in midfield.

  11. Well written again. My main worry is that this level of performance and tactical approach to games has now resulted in four major disappointments so far this season. Atletico, FC Sion x2 and Rangers.
    If you add this to other unconvincing performances this season for example St Johnstone, Aberdeen ,first half of the Hibs game and second half against St Mirren it’s clear to see that we have only really performed near our best against Motherwell and Dundee Utd (both home games).

    I feel the manager has to shoulder most of the blame for this poor start. I feel it’s time he sat down with the players and thrash out an agreement on a set system and a set starting 11.

    When we are good we’re very good, when we are poor we are really poor there just seems to be no middle ground where we are competent and effective.

    Hail, Hail

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s