Hibernian 1 – 4 Celtic: Another poor first-half precedes comeback

Celtic had to come back from 1-0 down after a dreadful first half at Easter Road, in the Scottish League Cup Quarter-final against Hibs. The alarm bells were ringing when Neil Lennon’s side looked at sixes and sevens during the opening 45 minutes, marked by a Daniel Majstorovic own goal. But the second-half recovery coincided with the home sides tired capitulation, and Celtic went on to dominate.

Celtic Lineup

Celtic lop-sided 4-4-2

Lennon didn’t rest any players in a competition that has seen every other SPL club eliminated apart from Kilmarnock. It was a return to the (previously) familiar lop-sided 4-4-2 system, with James Forrest used high up on the right.

Thomas Rogne made his long-awaited first appearance of the season having been out injured, taking into account Glen Loovens injury and Charlie Mulgrew suspension. With Mark Wilson’s return to the starting eleven, this made for yet another untried back four, with this being the 11th straight shuffle.

Lennon started with his first choice “central” three, and with no real other options up front, Anthony Stokes and Gary Hooper continued their mis-firing partnership.

Hibernian Lineup

Hibs 4-4-2/4-3-3

Under-fire manager Colin Calderwood had his own take on an asymmetrical formation, going for something between a 4-4-2 and 4-3-3. The main surprise in personnel was winger David Wotherspoon’s use at right-back, but with three “forwards” on the pitch in Gary O’Connor, Leigh Griffiths and Ivan Sproule, this made for an intriguing system.

The core midfield seemed to be aimed at matching Celtic’s, with Junior Agogo ahead of Isaiah Osbourne and Victor Palsson. It was also interesting to see the normal first-choice centre-back Paul Hanlon swapping places with Ian Murray, perhaps in anticipation of James Forrest’s piercing runs.

Finally, in goals, Calderwood opted for Mark Brown over Graham Stack, continuing his cup policy.

Hibs’ explosive opening

Not for the first-time this season, Celtic began with a yawn while the other side burst from the starting blocks. At this stage, without really knowing how Hibs were setting up (perhaps expecting the BBC’s prediction of a 4-4-2 diamond), Lennon’s side seemed taken aback by the strange 4-4-2/4-3-3 mixture: being matched man for man in midfield, man for man at centre-back, yet being punished on either flank.

The secret was: there was no right-midfielder, and all the pace was coming from a (perhaps over-stretched,) galloping David Wotherspoon. Similarly on the other side, Sproule and Griffiths were busting a gut to push in behind Celtic’s predictable, cumbersome back-line.

Celtic, out-manned (mainly) in the centre, couldn’t hold possession and under the ferociously urgent pressing, conceded quick corners and then the opening goal. While Majstorovic (who will take credit for the O.G.) will possibly get the blame, or even Ki at the front post, it was actually James Forrest who let Sproule go at the front post, early on in the corner.

Stepping into Calderwood’s plan

It was the kind of start that Hibs – a similarly under-performing side – needed, but what was follow was more to their liking. Celtic attacked in the precise areas that Calderwood wanted.

Hibs could defend deep and narrow – the three man buffer in the centre of midfield almost urged Celtic wide. Meanwhile, with Ki mostly spending his time as the furthest-left midfielder (rotating with Ledley) and Matthews (who was Celtic’s ‘most free’ player) similarly wrong-footed, the left-flank from a “quality cross providing” point-of-view, was practically a write-off. The Welshman again, not having quite the same impact when used on the wrong side.

Mark Wilson meanwhile was pinned back on the right (mostly) by the threat of Sproule, and James Forrest consistently couldn’t beat Hanlon – there wasn’t too much space to charge into. When Forrest did get in behind, the cross was poor, and besides – Hooper and Stokes aren’t especially good in the air.

Hibs were also inconspicuously breaking up moves and conceding fouls as far away from the box as possible (not unlike Aberdeen’s strategy at the weekend). Celtic – not a team known for it’s height – resorted to lumping in crosses from long-range set-pieces, and were committing defenders into the box.

Drawing out the centre-backs for such occasions suited Hibs, as observed on the counter-attack. Not only did Hibs generally leave three pacy players waiting upfield (as opposed to Celtic’s two full-backs), but they were very quick to release the ball (not dissimilar to Cha Du Ri’s own goal against his own team). With the attackers on the half-way line, the off-side rule becomes moot. It’s uneasy to imagine how Lennon could’ve dealt with this better, but perhaps leaving more players back – and back deeper or playing corners/set-pieces short, with a view to using technique over brawn to eke out goal-scoring chances.

Griffiths in particular squandered a gilt-edged one-on-one chance with Forster (who made numerous good saves), and at that stage a 2 goal deficit might’ve been too hard a blow to come back from. Perhaps Hooper could’ve made more from a couple of chances – at least one in a rare good chance created by Forrest on the right, and another when put clean through by Beram Kayal. Such is the case with teams down on their luck, Hooper’s half-chances came and went without much fuss.

Second-half revival – the ‘cut-in’

Celtic were on the ropes by half-time, but not for the second occasion this season, Lennon managed to inspire a second-half revival.

A major complaint of the first-half was, that the few times Forrest could get on the ball, he was taking it out wide into difficult crossing areas. Perhaps a more suitable idea would be to mimic the player he has (currently) replaced – Kris Commons, and cut inside to remove the need for aerial play.

Incidentally, the change in wing mentality bore immediate fruit, with Forrest on the 46th minute cutting in quite easily (and then back out onto his right-foot) to blast a shot past Brown.

Perhaps Hibs couldn’t keep up the same tempo (especially the knackered Wotherspoon) and the goal further dented their ambition. In fact, within the hour Forrest had scored a second – again through cutting in – working a nice one-two with Hooper and stunting his run just enough to beat the off-side trap.

It was a triumphant 15 minutes for Forrest, albeit immediately reminding the Celtic team of the fragility of Hibernian. Strange that it wasn’t apparent in the first place!

Final 30 minutes

The game was up for Hibs, and at this stage Lennon seemed to realise that with Hanlon providing next-to no attacking threat, or Wotherspoon on the other side, a centrally focused 4-4-2 diamond could get the most from a now resplendent James Forrest.

Beram Kayal, who save for setting up Hooper earlier, had a fairly disappointing game, was replaced by Victor Wanyama who is probably best used at the base of the diamond system. It also allowed Ki to come in slightly from his left-sided exile, no longer the deep-playmaking spark and now being used without rest as a kind of utility midfielder.

The antagonistic Sproule eventually earned a second yellow and was correctly dismissed, and with Hibs imploding Celtic were scoring for fun. Stokes first with an unchallenged header from Ki’s corner and then Hooper getting on the end of a long-ball from Matthews – the turn of the Hibs defence to push up unnaturally high in search of an equaliser.

Lennon then had time to experiment with a 4-2-3-1, using Paddy McCourt on the left-flank (on for Hooper), and Cha Du Ri on the right (on for match-winner James Forrest). McCourt in particularly teased the defence with his tricky running, Cha toiled on the right looking slightly out of touch, but ultimately the match was over as a contest. Hibs ploughed on with an optimistic 4-3-2 formation.

Conclusion

It started so well for Calderwood – his system perfectly nullifying Celtic in the right areas. The two strikers put pressure on Celtic’s two centre-backs – meaning an increase in balls played back to the under-pressure Forster. The midfield was more than congested, and the strikers isolated.

Sadly the high intensity, high-pressing system drew too much energy from a struggling side, and Wotherspoon looked particularly exposed as the match wore on.

It has to be asked (again) how Celtic can start matches so poorly? Sluggish, predictable and seemingly easy to rile. Though the defence coped rather well, it’s again a worry that the defence has been rotated once again – long after the time that Lennon convinced himself of the need for a settled back four.

Last seasons stars are still under-performing (Hooper, Kayal) some seem exhausted (Ki) and some error-prone. In the end, it was a fantastic score-line, but frustratingly the same old questions remain.

Advertisements

About tictacticuk

Football fan and commentator of all things Celtic FC.
This entry was posted in 2011/12, Hibs and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Hibernian 1 – 4 Celtic: Another poor first-half precedes comeback

  1. Little Drummer Bhoy says:

    TicTacTic, what are your thoughts on Wanyama? I was very disappointed to see him dropped for this game. Especially taking into account the protection he offers the defence,(a la Neil Lennon) I think his presence would go some way to increasing their confidence.

    I think Lennon is as well dropping Ki if he’s going to play him on the left. He’s due a stint on the bench anyway as the bit of steel that he added to his game last season has evaporated and much of the play seems to be pasing him by. The inconsitent Kayal was dismal tonight, although he did keep up his ability to consistently get booked.

    I bow to your superior knowledge here, genuinely. Tell me why the Celtic midfield should not have Victor Wanyama in it at the expense of Ki or Kayal?

    Plus points – Forrest on fire, Matthews good showing even though out of position, SCORING FROM A HEADER FROM A CORNER!!! Rogne back and looking decent. (He and Mulgrew could be the choice pairing.)

    Hopefully we can find some kind of consistency now!

    • tictacticuk says:

      Sorry to not get back to you Mr Drummer, seeing as you’ve been a good contributor 🙂

      I get the feeling with Lennon (and once upon a time with Mowbray) that they have a much more subtle view on attacking than many of us perhaps appreciate. The view essentially is, that *more attacking/forward thinking* players get more goals. That’s (arguably) why Cha is favoured over the more defensively sound Mulgrew, or as you’ve spoken about Ki/Kayal over Wanyama. (Although I do appreciate that there are rumours flying around that Wilson’s knee is absolutely shattered)

      I suppose Lennon probably also trusts Ki/Kayal/Ledley over any position whatsoever right now, and with Scott Brown coming back that complicates the CM position emphatically.

      Would also speculate that Wanyama is still unproven in a central 2 (saw a glimpse against Hibs towards the end in the 4-2-3-1) which almost rules out a flat 4-4-2. In fact, Wanyama seems a shoe-in for the 4-4-2 diamond when applied – which seems to be either European Comp or at rare/specific times in the SPL. So to answer your question: Ki/Kayal are far more experienced/proven and slightly more importantly offer more going forward. 🙂

  2. Jock67 says:

    A well written, tactically aware article. You don’t get this in the Daily Ranger or the Hun. Sorry, Sun.

    Keep it coming.

    First time reader looking forward to the next article.

    Hail! Hail!

  3. vinnylad says:

    Hi TicTactic

    Interesting read, though (and i may be mistaken), did Joe ledley not start on the left of the midfield with Ki in the middle?

    I felt in the 2nd half that it wasd Ledley who was the catalyst of change. Joe L and Ki switched positions and, where Ki will often turn away from trouble and pass out wide when in the middle, Ledley will drive right through it. That upped the speed of our game and helped leave them bare at the back when he drove through the midfield, oft giving forrest the space he required to run at the fullback, rather than having to press through a couple of midfielders before even reaching the defence when Ki is dictating traffic.

    Just my thoughts…..I might have been mistaken ofcourse.

    • tictacticuk says:

      Sorry about time it’s taken to reply..

      I’d agree that Ledley started on the left. It makes these positional diagrams all the harder as normally I like to keep them as the starting XI.

      But he swapped very quickly with Ki (probably two or three times) and it ended up that Ki spent more time on the left. That’s an interesting observation that Ledley takes things more direct from the centre – i.e. can take it past a player and open up some space. It’s at that point that defences have a bit of a WTF moment, as normally (even the top sides) tend to be shy of running at folk from deep in the middle. I guess it’s a risk strategy.

      Ledley’s making it impossible to *not* play him in the middle, while I think Ki brings a completely different angle to the midfield. That’s why I’ve said before that Ki is our most important midfielder – Ledley, Kayal and Brown are to different levels the same *type* of midfielder – bustling, driving forces. Just right now Ledley is by far the form player. Ki is a more continental flavour (like a better version of Crosas) preferring passing and patience. Patience is pretty rare on these Islands.

      Makes an argument that KI/Ledley should start in the middle allowing for genuine wingers on each side? However the cynic in me suspects that Kayal is playing off the back of that new contract.

      Cheers for reading, thanks for commenting

      Michael

  4. zerobeard says:

    Great blog – one of the few insightful, well-considered tactical blogs about celtic on the entire web that avoids hyperbole and short-sightedness. Please keep up the good work!

  5. CDeeps says:

    Keep up the good work! I look forward to reading this blog following every match.

  6. Thank you so much for giving everyone remarkably splendid chance to read from here. It’s always very superb and also packed with a great time for me personally and my office peers to visit your blog on the least thrice in a week to read the new stuff you have got. Not to mention, I am just actually amazed with your beautiful hints you serve. Some two tips in this posting are really the finest I have ever had.

  7. website says:

    An interesting blog post there mate . Thank you for the post !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s