Inverness CT 2 – 4 Celtic: Attack is best form of defence

Celtic flatter 4-4-2 pitched against Inverness Caley Thistle’s normal 4-2-3-1

It was a familiar scene for Celtic fans as another precocious young striker dashed beyond his marker to face the opposition keeper one-on-one. Making his full debut against Inverness Caley Thistle, Tony Watt had only made fleeting substitute appearances for the first-team, displaying all the enthusiasm of an over-energised rookie trying to justify his inclusion – all naive athleticism and bluster.

Like a whole host of examples before him, he has age on his side, the technique on the ball is there, and his physique still growing. The question though, was of the intangible “composure” quality, and in slotting coolly past Ryan Esson, Watt stoked the escalating hype surrounding him.

His second demonstrated the other great “intangible” – the ability to be in the right place at the right time, but more impressive than that was his movement, making Gary Hooper loke immobile in comparison. Constantly pushing into the space being vacated by David Raven the right-back (urged forward by Terry Butcher), and wading into a target-man style fight with Simon King. At 6’0 and still young, Watt may not strictly be the answer to the lingering target-man problem, but his differentiation in style to Hooper, Anthony Stokes and Mo Bangura provides his manager with a good problem.

Average Age

The youthful theme continued with other key performers. Victor Wanyama was conspicuous in his veteran like grip on the game, at the ripe old age of 21 while grabbing the opener in the process. Along with Filip Twardzik, who helped setup the second, the two bossed the centre of the pitch in a no-nonsense, safety first way. Richie Foran was an obvious miss for the hosts, his suspension demonstrating the point – a vicious hack last week earning him a red card. Inverness tried to physically impose in the absence of their captain, but the 2nd minute goal took the sharp edge out of the competition.


Though the initial lineup could’ve easily shaped up 3-5-2, Neil Lennon returned to the familiarity of 4-4-2 with an impressively young starting eleven. In truth it was probably the strongest XI available, with numerous injuries (and the sale of Ki Sung-Yeung) hindering the options. Most concerning was probably the unavailability of Kris Commons, a player so central to Lennon’s forward designs.

While the attacking vigour made for a 4-0 margin barely into an hour, the directness also serves as a worry for Wednesday’s match with Helsingborg. When firmly in control, it was still attack, attack, attack, with no thought for a possession-based defence. Aside from restricting the opposition’s chances, it also conserves energy relative to the opposition – it’s more tiring trying to win the ball-back higher up the park.

Inverness’ consolation goals were sloppy; Kelvin Wilson rushed out too far without adequately challenging the striker’s holdup work, and then Wanyama failed to track Ross Draper’s run. The second on paper, was down to Wanyama not even being on the field, nursing a knock, but equally down to communication. Twardzik was marooned in the middle of the park leaving Conor Pepper free to pick out Draper for his second.

The sloppyness however, was forgivable given the goal-lead and amount of young faces on the park. Joe Chalmers got a run out at left-back, while James Forrest was given a chance to improve his fitness before Wednesday, and Mo Bangura continues his underwhelming return from injury.

Lennon and Peter Lawwell may have been trimming the squad of late, but Watt and Twardzik are proving to be plausible alternatives in the long term.


About tictacticuk

Football fan and commentator of all things Celtic FC.
This entry was posted in 2012/13, Inverness CT and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Inverness CT 2 – 4 Celtic: Attack is best form of defence

  1. DF says:

    Thnaks again. Thought provoking insight as always. I thought Wanyama was a rock on Saturday, and that allowed Twardzik to flourish. To me, Izzaguirre looked closer to his best than he has for sometime.

  2. badlydrawnbhoys says:

    Your analysis is the only definitive tactical breakdown of a Celtic game I read so do not apologise for, or indeed feel the need to, dumb it down, whatever suits you seems to be doing alright it seems to me!

  3. celticman says:

    Like you I thought this seemed like a 442 but could easily have been a 352, with McCourt getting Kris Commons usual role behind the front two.

    Your praise of Watt is justified, he is looking very good indeed. I think what he has to prove is the he will continue to improve. Too many strikers have burst on the scene, made a good impression at a young age but never got any better. I hope Tony will.

    Now I wonder about Hooper and “the lingering target-man problem”. My view of late has been that we don’t need a target man. And it is linked to what Gary Hooper has been asked to do. He’s dropping deeper and picking up the ball, either by helping the midfield or by a longer ball being played into his feet.

    My questions then are;

    1) Do we need a target man? They seem to have gone out of fashion and Hooper is playing the deep-lying forward role.
    2) Are we utilizing Hooper the best way? I think he’s best as a Poacher it’s playing him in a deeper role that makes him seem immobile.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s