Celtic 2 – 2 Hibs: Not quite enough in reserves for depleted Celtic

Celtic’s 4-4-2 vs Hibernian 4-5-1

Going into the match lacking 8 first-team starters while off the back of Wednesday’s tough Champions League qualifier against Helsingborg, it was always going to be an uphill struggle for Celtic. And with the exception of Kris Commons (still shaking off injury himself), the outfield options on the bench consisted of strictly academy level players.

The tempo of the match, at least for the first hour reflected this, with Hibs content to sit back and hoard the ball as much as possible, and Celtic keeping to the extremely direct strategy put in place of late. It was the classic 4-4-2 vs 4-5-1 scenario, manifesting in good possession for Hibs with little in the way of chances, with Celtic the opposite.

Hibs were lucky to be within touching distance at all over the first 45 minutes, with Gary Hooper hitting the bar and post, Tony Watt squandering a decent one-on-one, and James Forrest also coming close. This all coming in a decidedly tepid match with both sides ticking along barely venturing out of first gear.

Despite the host of chances, Hibs were doing a decent job diminishing Celtic’s attacking threats, with Forrest and Paddy McCourt doubled up on, and Hooper’s irregular dropping into the hole being dealt with quite easily by the sitting midfielder Jorge Claros. At the other end Leigh Griffiths, not at all a traditional lone striker, was struggling to get on the end of any final passes.

Tactically so far, so reasonable for Hibs, but one area lacking in organisation was in defending dead-balls. It was unfamiliar seeing Celtic’s set-piece takers not include Charlie Mulgrew, Anthony Stokes, Kris Commons or the departed Ki Sung-Yeung, but still, Celtic threatened continually via this method. The breakthrough came through a McCourt delivery plopping scandalously low (from Pat Fenlon’s point of view) in the middle of the 6-yard box. Mikael Lustig benefited by tapping in freely.

If anything the match was slowing down early into the second half, and after Wanyama was replaced like-for-like by Jackson Irvine due to a dead-leg, Hibs were handed a fortunate equaliser. For all his positives, Frazer Forster’s Achilles heel is knowing when to decisively snatch a contested ball in the box. Equally culpable was Lustig, who failed to either clear the loose ball or communicate effectively with Forster, and Tim Clancy was in luck.

All four goals were defined by sloppy defending mixed with good (or bad) fortune, with the third being spilled poorly by Hibs keeper Ben Williams, and the fourth Adam Matthews feebly allowing Paul Cairney through on goal.

With Celtic chasing the winner, Commons was brought on for McCourt and pushed up front. Watt took up a kind of Samaras position on the left (an area he enjoys drifting into anyway) with Forrest continuing to cut inside rather than work a path outside Alan Maybury.

Why use an inside-left as a striker and a striker on the left? It’s likely to be a return to the dependency on Commons for clutch moments – pushed higher towards goal to maximise that left-foot. Besides, Watt is more suited to breaking in behind the defence, stretching the defence rather than forcing it narrow (like Commons might).

While ultimately the change (and match in general) proved ineffective for Celtic, there were a host of positives. The success was in creating so many chances with such a depleted squad, and in the continuing development of key youngsters – Watt and Twardzik. From a managers perspective, little else can be done other than put out a side able to create enough chances to win the match. Individual errors (as demonstrated in the goals conceded) cannot really be accounted for. The international break next weekend will be a chance for the squad to recuperate and build towards the Champions League, where such profligacy will not be so easily forgiven.

Advertisements

About tictacticuk

Football fan and commentator of all things Celtic FC.
This entry was posted in Hibs, Match Analysis and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Celtic 2 – 2 Hibs: Not quite enough in reserves for depleted Celtic

  1. justshatered says:

    We should have been at least three up at half time.
    Tony Watt tried to be too clever when one on one.
    Hooper was unlucky twice.
    When Wanyama went off the midfield was too light weight with just too many inexperienced players. Twardzik will come good but will require to be nursed through games for a season or two.
    I don’t even know the young boy Irvine who came on but I think he struggled in the middle of the park and here Hibs should be given some credit as they played nice triangles in tight positions.
    As bizarre as it may seem, although Paddy McCourt was the oldest player in the midfield, the most experienced was Forrest and I don’t think the example he set was the best. Continually stopping and throwing his hands up in the air when he feels a slight tug is not good enough but to compound that, when he doesn’t get the free kick, he just stops and does not track back. Forrest has got to understand that he is playing for Celtic and he will generally not get these decisions regardless of whether the opposition do. He will eventually, if he hasn’t already, get a name for looking for fouls. He should have been helping Twardzik and Irvine by working his socks off and telling them what to do.
    I’ve been concerned by Izaguirre since the start of the season. He is continually out of position and more importantly slow getting back. He attempts to be clever in very dangerous positions. If he tries this in the CL he will get his, and our, backsides kicked.
    Celtic always have at least one comedy goal a season and the Hibs opener today was up there with any that I’ve witnessed in the last thirty years. The ball did seem to check badly when it landed and at that point, if Lustig does not get the shout, it has to go to row z. Some credit must go to the Hibs forward for at least following it in but for me Foster has to take the blame. First of all he is looking up the park and Lustig might not know how close the opposition player is so he has got to tell the defender to deal with it. However even before this his starting position was all wrong; why is it he is always within three or four yards of his goal line when a ball like today’s is played into the box. To me he should be between the six yard box and the penalty spot as this allows him to go either forwards or backwards and he is basically covering his options. By the time he decided to come today it was already too late. Lustig had no room to get rid of it as Foster was in his face and the Hibs player was in his socks. As I say Lustig, when he didn’t get a shout, should have put it out the park but ultimately communication, or better positioning, would easily have prevented that goal.
    Anyway at least we did not lose the game but it is always frustrating to come away from a ground knowing that the points should have been in the bag at half time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s